The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) will go to the United Nations Security Council and seek full membership in the world body next week, despite the looming threat of a U.S. veto, a Palestinian official said.

A Palestinian boy pushes a trolley past Israeli soldiers standing near a temporary road block during a protest against the continued closure by Israel of Shuhada street in the West Bank city of Hebron September 14, 2011. REUTERS/Ammar Awad

The announcement was made by Mohammed Shtayyeh, a senior member of Fatah’s central committee, at a news conference in Ramallah on Tuesday. Fatah is the largest Palestinian faction in the PLO. 

His announcement would seem to end months of speculation about the PLO’s diplomatic strategy. 

“We are going to the United Nations, we are going to the Security Council,” Shtayyeh said. “We are going to seek full membership based on 1967 borders.” 

Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority (PA) president, will deliver a speech in Ramallah on Friday night outlining the bid. 

Full recognition would allow Palestine to vote at the U.N., and to join the International Criminal Court and other world bodies. 

The PLO will have little trouble securing the required two-thirds majority at the General Assembly; more than 120 nations have already promised to support the bid, according to Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator. 

But the White House and various other U.S. officials have already pledged to veto the Palestinian bid, and it cannot proceed without Security Council approval. 

In that case, the PLO could still pursue “non-member observer status,” which would give it diplomatic standing on a par with the Vatican. But it is unclear what, if anything, would change after that upgrade. Still, some Palestinian officials have urged the PLO to avoid the U.S. veto and go directly to the General Assembly. 

Shtayyeh acknowledged that, even if the United Nations approves the bid, it will not immediately change daily life for Palestinians. 

“Things on the ground are not going to be different,” he said. “The difference will happen on the political level. Palestinians will join U.N. institutions… and the Palestinian territories will no longer be considered ‘disputed lands’ but occupied lands.” Shtayyeh said the PLO was undecided on how it would respond to a U.S. veto: It could petition the General Assembly for upgraded status, or go back to the Security Council, forcing another veto. 

The announcement also signals that the PLO does plan to go through with the bid, despite a last-minute diplomatic push by the U.S. and other nations aimed at derailing it. 

Shtayyeh said Abbas would submit the official paperwork after arriving in New York next week, and that the submission will deal with refugees, borders, the status of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and other issues. 

Salah Bardawil, a senior Hamas official in Gaza, criticized the U.N. bid, saying that Abbas has not consulted with Hamas about it. 

“It’s a unilateral action by Abbas, just like Oslo was unilateral,” he said, referring to the 1993 Oslo Accords. “Whether they go to the Security Council or the General Assembly, it makes no difference to us.”  

The Israeli government did not directly comment on the PLO’s announcement, but Mark Regev, a spokesman for the Israeli prime minister, reiterated the government’s opposition to the bid. 

“You can get a piece of paper through the United Nations, but you cannot get an independent state,” he told Al Jazeera. 

The U.S. State Department issued a brief statement on Tuesday, calling the U.N. bid “unhelpful to the necessary process of the two sides getting back to the negotiating table,” an argument it has made many times before. 

Two U.S. envoys, David Hale and Dennis Ross, will return to the region this week in a last-ditch effort to convince the PLO to abandon its bid. The U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv would not comment on their visit. Hale and Ross visited Jerusalem and Ramallah last week on a similar mission. 

Palestinian officials expect a majority of the 27-nation European Union to support their bid. But EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who attended an Arab League meeting in Cairo on Monday night, said that the EU’s official position is to support renewed negotiations instead of a U.N. vote. 

The PA is planning a series of marches and rallies, in the West Bank and internationally, to coincide with the vote. Abbas is expected to address the General Assembly on Sep. 23. 

The bid has been sharply criticized by many Palestinians, particularly in Gaza and in the diaspora, who view it as a purely Fatah-led initiative. Legal scholars say a “yes” vote would also call into question the legitimacy of the PA itself. 

Abbas has described the bid as a “last resort” brought on by the collapse of negotiations between Israel and the PLO. 

Talks have been stalled for nearly a year over Israel’s refusal to halt the construction of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. 

PA officials say the impasse leaves them with no choice but to turn to the U.N.; Abbas has offered to suspend the bid and resume talks if Israel halts settlement growth and agrees to use 1967 borders as a basis for negotiations. 

Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, insists that he will only resume talks without those preconditions.

Factions disagree with move

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the Popular Struggle Front,  and the Palestinian National Initiative all support the UN bid.

Hamas, however, does not support the bid for UN recognition on the grounds that it is a unilateral move by the president.

Hamas official Musheer Al-Masri says the bid is an “individual step taken by President Abbas without consulting any faction.”

Senior Hamas leader Mahmoud Zahhar says the Gaza Strip, which Hamas controls, has been left out of the campaign.

Islamic Jihad also criticized the PA for launching the bid unilaterally.

“This move needs to be studied to make sure it will not ignore major issues such as the right of return, and the future of the Palestine Liberation Organization as a umbrella for the whole Palestinian people,” said Islamic Jihad spokesman Dawood Shihab.