Israeli society is constantly swerving to the right. The country’s entire political paradigm is redefined regularly. 

Israel is now “ruled by the most extreme rightwing government in its history.” This statement has grown from being an informed assessment to a dull cliché over the course of only a few years.

In fact, that exact line was used in May 2015, when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu formed his thin majority government of like-minded right-wingers, religious zealots and ultra-nationalists. The same sentiment, with almost the exact wording, is being infused again, as Netanyahu has expanded his coalition by bringing to the fold the ultra-nationalist Avigdor Lieberman as defense  minister.  

Considering Lieberman’s rowdy and violent politics, as demonstrated in his two terms as foreign minister, being a defense minister in Israel’s “most extreme rightwing government in history” harbors all kind of terrifying prospects.

Commentators rightly pointed to Lieberman’s past provocations and wild statements. For example, he threatened to behead Palestinian citizens of Israel with an axe if they are not fully loyal to Israel; he advocated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian citizens of Israel; he issued a death ultimatum to former Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya. However, his predecessor, Moshe Ya’alon, was spared much blame.

Worse, Ya’alon was regarded by some as an example of professionalism and morality. He is “well-regarded,” wrote William Booth in the Washington Post, compared to the “polarizing maverick” Lieberman. But well-regarded by whom? By Israeli society, the majority of whom support the cold-blooded murder of Palestinians?

Israel has adhered to its own definition of political terminology for a long time. Its early “socialism” was a blend of communal living, facilitated by military onslaught and sustained by colonialism. Its current definition of left, right and center are also relative, unique to Israel itself.

Thanks to Lieberman — the Russian immigrant, club bouncer-turned-politician who is constantly rallying the roughly one million Israeli Russian Jews around his ever-violent political agenda — Ya’alon is now an example of level-headedness and morality.

Indeed, the quote that has been reproduced numerous times in the media is that of Ya’alon stating the reason behind his resignation is that he has lost confidence in Netanyahu’s decision-making and morals.

Morals? Let’s examine the evidence.

Ya’alon took part in every major Israeli war since 1973 and his name was later associated with the most atrocious of Israeli wars and massacres, first in Lebanon and later in Gaza.

His morality never dissuaded him from ordering some of the most unspeakable war crimes carried out against civilians, neither in Qana, Lebanon (1996) nor in Shujaya, Gaza (2014).

Ya’alon refused to cooperate with any international investigation conducted by the U.N. or any other monitoring group into his violent conduct. In 2005, he was sued in a U.S. court by the survivors of the Qana massacre in which hundreds of civilians and U.N. peacekeepers were killed and wounded in Israeli military strikes. In that case, neither Israeli nor American morality prevailed and justice is yet to be delivered.

Ya’alon, who received military training early in his career at the British Army’s Camberley Staff College, continued to rise in rank within the army until 2002 when he was appointed chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces. He was in that post for nearly three years, as a result of which he ordered the assassination of hundreds of Palestinians and oversaw various massacres that were carried out by the Israeli army during the Second Intifada.

His post was terminated by then-Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz in 2005. In this case, it was also immorality, not morality, that played a role in the conflict between him and his superiors. Ya’alon was, and remains, an ardent advocate for the illegal colonization of Palestinian land. In 2005, he vehemently rejected the so-called redeployment from the Gaza Strip, in which a few thousands illegal settlers were relocated to Jewish colonies in the West Bank.

His war crimes caught up with him in New Zealand in 2006 over the assassination of Hamas commander Saleh Shehade with 14 members of his family and other civilians. An arrest order was issued but revoked later, under heavy political pressure, allowing Ya’alon to escape the country.

He returned to the helm of the army in 2013, just in time to carry out the devastating war on Gaza in 2014, which killed 2,257 Palestinians in 51 days. The U.N. monitoring group, OCHA, estimated that more than 70 percent of those killed were civilians, including 563 children.

The destruction of Shujaya, in particular, was a calculated strategy devised by Ya’alon himself. In a July 2013 meeting with U.N. Secretary-General, Ban-Ki-Moon, Ya’alon informed the U.N. chief that he would bomb the entire neighborhood in case of war. He did.

In May 2015, he was still unrepentant. Speaking at a conference in Jerusalem, he threatened to kill civilians in case of another war on Lebanon.

“We are going to hurt Lebanese civilians to include kids of the family,” he said. “We went through a very long deep discussion. We did it then, we did it in (the) Gaza Strip, we are going to do it in any round of hostilities in the future.”

He also spoke implicitly of dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran.

He repeatedly gave the Israeli occupation army the green light to carry out “shoot to kill” policy against Palestinians to fight rising “tension” in the Occupied Territories.

These are the words of Ya’alon during a visit to a military base in Gush Etzion in November 2014.

“It must be clear that anyone who comes to kill Jews must be eliminated. Any terrorist who raises a gun, knife or rock, tries to run over or otherwise attack Jews, must be put to death.”

Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in recent months in Occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Many of those killed are stone-throwing children who are facing Israeli army vehicles along with thousands of trigger-happy Jewish settlers.

In his first public remarks since his resignation, Ya’alon accused a “vocal minority” in Israel of targeting the country’s “basic values”, stating that the country’s “moral compass” has been lost.

The odd thing is that many Israelis agree with Ya’alon. They see the man who has been accused of carrying out war crimes for most of his career as an example of morality and basic values.

While Lieberman has demonstrated to be a loose cannon and a political liability, Ya’alon has openly spoken of targeting children and repeatedly lived up to his promises.

When the likes of Ya’alon, a man with a blood-stained record, becomes the face of morality in Israel, once can understand why the future of that country brings little hope, especially now that Lieberman has brought his Israel Our Home Party to Netanyahu’s terrifying nest of political parties. 

–Dr. Ramzy Baroud has been writing about the Middle East for over 20 years. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist and a media consultant.